About us | About Scoope | Contact us
Scopelogo
 
google

 
  
 Sponsor Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Knowledgespeak’s exclusive interview with Clive Snell, Managing Director, Info International
NEWS ARCHIVES ACROSS THEMES  
  News archives across months
  News archives across themes
    News archives across category
     
  News articles recently covered under
Copyrights/Data Integrity/Ethical issues
 


LIBER joins call for improved Text and Data Mining Exception
- 02 Apr 2018

Twenty eight organisations, including LIBER, have signed a letter calling for an improved Text and Data Mining Exception which will support research and innovation in Europe.

The letter was sent to the European Parliament Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI). The signatories include universities, technology companies, startups and scaleups, libraries, scientific and research funding and performing organisations, open access publishers, investigative and data journalists and nonprofits.

The growing use of big data and artificial intelligence tools in research and innovation now result from the seamless collaboration between public and private organisations. According to LIBER, this successful ecosystem will be penalised if the European Parliament's work on TDM in the Copyright Directive continues in its current direction.

The letter makes the point that Text and Data Mining plays a key role in Artificial Intelligence. Any comprehensive strategy to make Europe globally competitive in the race to develop and implement AI-powered solutions must therefore include robust support for TDM in both the public and private research industries, and not be reserved for very limited non-commercial public interest research projects.

It also notes that limiting the ability of private companies to carry out TDM in Europe will inevitably lead to the most promising European startups and companies relocating to the US or Japan, where the legal frameworks will allow them to have access to broader datasets, and where they will be able to build algorithms of better quality.

Specifically, the signatories of the letter are asking the JURI Committee to broaden the scope of Article 3.1 to include any person (natural or legal) that has lawful access to content, provided that reproduction or extraction is used for the sole purpose of text and data mining; support the European Commission's proposal on article 3.2 to ensure that contractual terms restricting the use of the exception are unenforceable; clarify in Article 3.3 that technical measures cannot be used to unreasonably restrict the exception's beneficiaries to conduct TDM; and add a paragraph in Article 3 to allow datasets created for the purpose of TDM to be stored on secured servers for future verification.

Brought to you by Scope e-Knowledge Center, a trusted global partner for digital content transformation solutions - Abstracting&Indexing (A&I), Knowledge Modeling (Taxonomies, Thesauri and Ontologies), and Metadata Enrichment&Entity Extraction.
   
Click here

FTC halts deceptive practices of academic journal publishers
- 28 Nov 2017

A federal court recently granted a preliminary injunction requested by the Federal Trade Commission, temporarily halting the deceptive practices of academic journal publishers charged by the agency with making false claims about their journals and academic conferences, and hiding their publishing fees, which were up to several thousand dollars.

The preliminary injunction against OMICS Group Inc., iMedPub LLC, Conference Series LLC, and their CEO, director, and owner, Srinubabu Gedela stems from a complaint the FTC filed last year that names Gedela and his three companies as defendants.

The defendants operate several websites, including OMICSonline.org, iMedPub.com, and Conferenceseries.com. They advertise hundreds of online academic journals and international conferences for scientists and medical professionals.

According to the complaint, the defendants deceptively claim that their journals provide authors with rigorous peer review and have editorial boards made up of prominent academics when in fact, many articles are published with little to no peer review and many individuals represented to be editors have not agreed to be affiliated with the journals.

The FTC's complaint alleges that the defendants do not tell authors submitting papers for publication that, after their online journals accept an article, the defendants charge the authors significant publishing fees and often do not allow authors to withdraw their articles from submission, making their research ineligible for publication in other journals.

The FTC also alleges that, to promote their scientific conferences, the defendants deceptively use the names of prominent researchers as conference presenters, when in fact many of those researchers had not agreed to participate in the events.

The FTC's complaint charges the defendants with multiple violations of the FTC Act's prohibition on deceptive acts or practices.

The preliminary injunction entered by a federal district court in the District of Nevada prohibits the defendants from making misrepresentations regarding their academic journals and conferences, including that specific persons are editors of their journals or have agreed to participate in their conferences. It also prohibits the defendants from falsely representing that their journals engage in peer review, that their journals are included in any academic journal indexing service, or any measurement of the extent to which their journals are cited. It also requires that the defendants clearly and conspicuously disclose all costs associated with submitting or publishing articles in their journals.

Brought to you by Scope e-Knowledge Center, a trusted global partner for digital content transformation solutions - Abstracting&Indexing (A&I), Knowledge Modeling (Taxonomies, Thesauri and Ontologies), and Metadata Enrichment&Entity Extraction.
   
Click here

Court ruling in favour of ACS in a case against Sci-Hub
- 07 Nov 2017

The American Chemical Society (ACS) has welcomed the court ruling in its case against Sci-Hub, a self-proclaimed web pirate organisation that steals and then illegally reproduces and disseminates copyrighted scientific research articles on the internet. Issued by Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on Nov. 3, the ruling orders Sci-Hub to cease infringement of ACS' copyrights, as well as counterfeiting and infringement of its trademarks.

The ruling is a victory for copyright law and the entire publishing enterprise. It was clear from the outset that Sci-Hub has pirated copyrighted and trademarked content on a massive scale. The group's decision to not attend the court proceedings, leading to the default judgment, speaks to the fact that it was in an indefensible position.

The ruling in ACS' favour provides an injunction against Sci-Hub, and those in active concert or participation with it, to stop misappropriating the Society's copyrighted and trademarked material. It also ordered Sci-Hub to pay $4.8 million in damages to ACS.

The relief provided by Brinkema in this case speaks about the serious nature of Sci-Hub's actions. The court order applies to Sci-Hub and technical service providers that have a relationship with Sci-Hub, which is consistent with longstanding legal precedent. ACS will now begin enforcement accordingly.

Brought to you by Scope e-Knowledge Center, a trusted global partner for digital content transformation solutions - Abstracting&Indexing (A&I), Knowledge Modeling (Taxonomies, Thesauri and Ontologies), and Metadata Enrichment&Entity Extraction.
   
Click here

LIBER signs open letter calling for revised Text and Data Mining (TDM) exception
- 26 Sep 2017

Twenty organisations, including LIBER, have signed an open letter to European lawmakers calling for changes to a proposed Text and Data Mining exception.

Coordinated by the European Alliance for Research Excellence, the letter asks Members of the Legal Affairs Committee (JURI) in the European Parliament and Deputy Permanent Representatives of the 28 Member States to fix the Text and Data Mining (TDM) exception in the European Commission's proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market.

If the current proposal for a TDM exception is not revised, the vast majority of the European research and innovation ecosystem will be penalised. Scientists and students will have to pay extra licenses, and small businesses and startups who will stop innovating in Europe due to legal uncertainty.

In addition to signing this open letter, LIBER published its own call for changes to the proposed TDM Exception. The four key points to be addressed: make the TDM exception mandatory and non-overridable; include libraries and all persons with lawful access to content as beneficiaries; allow commercial and non-commercial uses, without compensation; and permit safe storage of copies made for TDM.

Brought to you by Scope e-Knowledge Center, a trusted global partner for digital content transformation solutions - Abstracting&Indexing (A&I), Knowledge Modeling (Taxonomies, Thesauri and Ontologies), and Metadata Enrichment&Entity Extraction.
   
Click here

LIBER signs open letter to stop potentially harmful copyright reform
- 08 Sep 2017

LIBER has signed an open letter directed at the EU's Legal Affairs Committee (JURI), in an attempt to stop recent EU copyright reform developments which threaten Open Access and Open Science.

In the letter, LIBER and 14 other organisations express particular alarm at the potential impact of Article 11, which relates to Ancillary Copyright, and Article 13, which relates to filtering user-uploaded content, of the draft Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market.

LIBER is working on many issues related to copyright reform, in order to ensure the best possible outcome for research and knowledge creation.

Article 11 already poses a significant threat to an informed and literate society. Links to news and the use of titles, headlines and fragments of information could now become subject to licensing. Terms could make the last two decades of news less accessible to researchers and the public, leading to a distortion of the public's knowledge and memory of past events. Art. 11 would furthermore place EU law in contravention with the Berne Convention, whose Art. 2(8) excludes news of the day and 'mere items of press information' and 'press summaries' from protection. The extension of this controversial proposal to academic publications, as proposed by the ITRE Committee, significantly worsens an already bad situation, the letter reads.

The letter also explains how Article 13 poses a threat to the accessibility of scientific articles, publications and research data made available through over 1250 repositories managed by European non-profit institutions and academic communities.

LIBER, along with all of the letter's signatories, urges for the removal of these proposals, and also request improvements on proposals related to text and data mining, copyright in an education setting, and preservation and access to works for non-commercial endeavours.

Work on the open letter was led by SPARC Europe, with CESAER, COAR, The Commons Network, Communia Association, Creative Commons, C4C, EBLIDA, EIFL, EUA, Free Knowledge Advocacy Group EU, IFLA, LIBER, RLUK and Science Europe all adding their support.

Brought to you by Scope e-Knowledge Center, a world-leading provider of metadata services, abstraction, indexing, entity extraction and knowledge organisation models (Taxonomies, Thesauri and Ontologies).
   
Click here

For banner ads click here