In today's rapidly evolving financial landscape, the intersection of finance and sustainability stands as a critical central point. ESG data has emerged as the cornerstone, influencing investment decisions, shaping risk management strategies, guiding long-term sustainability initiatives, and ensuring regulatory adherence for financial institutions. As we delve into the realm of ESG data and its regulatory landscape within the financial sector, it is essential to underscore the imminent EU-driven regulatory transformations poised to reshape the industry.
An integrated taxonomy is a harmonized set of business terms with clear unambiguous definitions describing the business’ data need for data attributes (so-called consumer requirements), linked to each other with relationships. By consolidating various consumer requirements, it simplifies complex reporting structures, leading to streamlined processes. This integration is rooted in determining granular data requirements and populating the taxonomy through data analysis. The outcome is a unified data collection process that enhances reporting agility, facilitates reconciliation, and makes it easier to include and update changes in regulations.
Navigating the European regulatory landscape for ESG requirements is a complex effort marked by rapid evolution and interdependence. In recent years, a multitude of ESG regulations, directives, and frameworks have been planned, each possessing distinct scopes, requirements, and levels of detail. These regulations, united under the EU Green Deal's banner, collectively shape a dispersed collection of data requirements that must be consistently implemented.
One of the foremost challenges in handling ESG data is the lack of clear and universally accepted definitions for data requirements. As the regulatory landscape evolves, financial institutions may encounter situations where new data requirements need to be added to their existing data sets. Implementing and sourcing these requirements require dedicated focus and time, which can be difficult to prioritize with existing programs and initiatives in the bank.
ESG data requirements can be intricate and consist of multiple underlying data requirements. Breaking down these requirements into more granular components is essential to ensure accurate and comprehensive reporting. This process of decomposition can be resource-intensive and requires knowledge of both reporting and data. By addressing the challenges of merging diverse data streams and ensuring data quality, banks can foster a more sustainable and responsible financial sector.
Click here to read the original article published by Deloitte.
Please give your feedback on this article or share a similar story for publishing by clicking here.
