Research Content Services

customer support

Appeals Court reverses district court’s fair use decision in Cambridge University Press v. J.L. Albert -

In an opinion released October 19, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit unanimously reversed the district court's fair use decision in Cambridge University Press v. J.L. Albert and agrees with publishers reversing the GSU litigation involving the unauthorized use of numerous copyrighted works. The appeals court remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with its instructions.

In reversing the district court's erroneous findings and vacating the award of attorney's fees, the appellate panel for the second time rejected what it called a 'mathematical formula' of fair use in favour of a 'qualitative consideration of each instance of copying in the light of its particular facts.'

This kind of careful scrutiny and detailed application is essential to the efficacy of copyright law, whether in the print or digital environment. As the Supreme Court noted in its landmark Campbell v. Acuff-Rose decision, the four statutory factors may not 'be treated in isolation, one from another. All are to be explored, and the results weighed together, in light of the purposes of copyright.'

Brought to you by Scope e-Knowledge Center, a trusted global partner for digital content transformation solutions - Abstracting & Indexing (A&I), Knowledge Modeling (Taxonomies, Thesauri and Ontologies), and Metadata Enrichment & Entity Extraction.

Click here to read the original press release.


  • |
  • |

sponsor links

For banner ads click here

STM Week - Innovations Seminar; STM Solutions Seminar; STM Day