The Journal Comparison Service (JCS) has announced a significant change to its data submission process, effective from November 1, 2024. Moving forward, JCS will exclusively accept data supplied using the Information Power (IP) framework, discontinuing support for the Fair Open Access (FOAA) framework. This strategic shift aims to simplify data comparison for end users and enhance the overall utility of the service.
The decision to adopt a single framework follows a recommendation from the JCS Advisory Panel. The panel emphasized the necessity for end users to easily compare data on services provided and prices charged across all journals, a task that has been complicated by the concurrent use of two different frameworks since JCS's inception.
Since its launch, JCS has utilized both the IP and FOAA frameworks to meet cOAlition S's requirement for price transparency in funded articles. However, data from participating publishers reveals a significant preference for the IP framework. Specifically, 59% of publishers use the IP framework, and 86% of journal titles provide data using this framework. In contrast, 41% of publishers and a lesser proportion of journal titles use the FOAA framework.
While both frameworks collect the same bibliographic data, the IP framework is noted for its detailed price and service data. For instance, it gathers comprehensive information on peer review services, such as the median number of reviews and the median time from submission to the first decision. Additionally, it requires publishers to break down fees into eight discrete elements, including journal development, peer review, and post-publication services, encompassing any profits or surpluses. Conversely, the FOAA framework includes only five price elements, with one focused on profits and surpluses. These discrepancies have made cross-framework journal comparisons challenging.
In light of these insights, cOAlition S has mandated the use of the IP framework for JCS due to its broader usage and greater granularity. Publishers currently using the FOAA framework are requested to transition to the IP framework for the submission of their 2024 price and service data.
The JCS Advisory Panel recognizes that this transition may present challenges for some publishers. However, by providing ample notice and clarifying the goal of enhancing the JCS's usability, the panel anticipates that most participating publishers will adapt to this new requirement successfully.
This unified approach aims to streamline the comparison process for end users, making it easier to access and analyze comprehensive data about journal services and pricing. The JCS remains committed to supporting publishers through this transition and ensuring that the service continues to meet the needs of the scholarly publishing community.
Click here to read the original press release.
