A group of 41 Nobel Prize-winning scientists, including 16 chemists, are urging the US Congress to require the results of federally funded research to be made freely available online. In an open letter to lawmakers the Nobel laureates endorse the Federal Research Public Access Act of 2009. The legislation would mandate that 11 US government agencies with annual extramural research expenditures over $100 million make journal articles resulting from their grants freely accessible. These manuscripts would be housed in a digital archive and be available at no charge within six months of publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
Proponents of the legislation argue that the taxpayers who underwrite this research, at tens of billions of dollars annually, have a right to access its results. But opponents say publishers deserve compensation for the value that their peer review process brings to government-funded research. American Chemical Society (ACS) spokesperson Glenn Ruskin says the bill would simply take this value conferred by publishers without compensation, and make it much harder for scientific journals to sustain operations.
Robert Curl, who won the chemistry Nobel in 1996 and signed the letter to Congress, agrees that 'knowledge should be freely transmitted.' But he also acknowledges that mandatory open access is a 'big problem' because it would greatly reduce the revenue stream to cover publication expenses.
Curl suggests that institutions could pay a substantial annual fee for a licence for their employees to publish in existing open access journals. But this wouldn't make it any less expensive for individuals or research institutions to gain access to the information in the peer reviewed journals of ACS and other scientific organisations.
Search for more new publishing models in K-Store
Discuss this NEWS
More News in this Theme
