The convergence of open access and public engagement in research presents an opportunity to amplify the societal impact of academic work. Both approaches emphasize the importance of broad accessibility and inclusive participation in knowledge creation, aiming to address urgent global challenges through more equitable dissemination and use of research.
Advocates of open access underscore the need to make scholarly work widely available, while those involved in community-engaged research focus on ensuring that scientific knowledge is co-developed with and informed by diverse stakeholder groups. Amid financial constraints within higher education, aligning these efforts may enable more effective advocacy for systemic reform and resource allocation.
Strategic coordination among proponents of open scholarship, community engagement, responsible research assessment, and public impact is seen as essential to advancing a cohesive vision. A unified approach to messaging and advocacy can foster institutional support for reforms that promote both accessibility and demonstrable societal value. Presenting collective requests to academic leadership, rather than fragmented appeals, is considered more persuasive in driving change.
The Impact Funders Forum and the Presidents and Chancellors Council on Public Impact Research represent two growing coalitions committed to closing the gap between research outputs and public benefit. These groups, involving funders and academic leaders, aim to strengthen infrastructures and incentives for publicly impactful scholarship. Their expansion reflects a broader recognition of the need to justify research investments through measurable outcomes that serve the public interest.
A key point of intersection between open access and community-engaged research is the issue of accessibility. Paywalled content can obstruct participation by non-academic collaborators, whereas open scholarship facilitates more equitable partnerships by ensuring shared access to information. Conversely, public engagement initiatives seek to broaden the definition of scholarly output beyond traditional journal articles to include products such as policy briefs, community reports, and other applied contributions.
Recent developments in research culture reveal a generational shift. Many early-career scholars are increasingly drawn to interdisciplinary work, cross-sector collaborations, and community-facing research. This trend, coupled with evolving funding models, is prompting institutions to reconsider how they support and evaluate public scholarship.
In this context, efforts are underway to develop integrated frameworks for supporting public-facing, open research. One such initiative, Modernizing Scholarship for the Public Good, identifies strategic actions that universities can take to strengthen both open access and public engagement. These actions include fostering leadership across institutional roles, building mutual understanding among administrators with expertise in open scholarship and engagement, and ensuring that their messaging resonates with senior academic decision-makers.
Institutional reforms in academic evaluation—particularly in areas such as appointment, retention, promotion, and tenure—are central to these efforts. Cross-departmental collaboration among university librarians, engagement officers, academic affairs leaders, and research administrators is seen as critical to advancing these changes. Regular communication and aligned strategies can support the adoption of alternative metrics that incorporate societal impact alongside traditional scholarly indicators.
Further opportunities for collaboration include launching joint funding initiatives, integrating award and recognition programs, and co-developing professional development offerings. These shared efforts aim to elevate the visibility of research that is both accessible and publicly engaged.
The current landscape is marked by structural transformation in research culture. Many within the academic community view this as a moment to reimagine the role of the university in society, with a focus on public value. Sustaining efforts to embed public impact as a core objective of research institutions is seen as a shared priority, regardless of the broader policy or funding environment.
Click here to read the original press release.
