YOUR GO-TO INTELLIGENCE RESOURCE FOR THE SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING INDUSTRY

The Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers (ALPSP) has issued a comprehensive response to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) regarding its Second Generative AI Consultation. In their detailed statement, ALPSP underscores the importance of clarity and compliance with data protection and intellectual property regulations in the development and deployment of generative AI technologies.

ALPSP commends the ICO’s initiative to provide clarity on the legitimate purposes required under current data protection laws, particularly in the context of generative AI. They emphasize the necessity of ensuring that the UK’s regulatory framework evolves to address the challenges and opportunities presented by artificial intelligence.

The response highlights the critical need for personal data and legally protected content to be repurposed under lawful bases such as consent, licensing, or permission by law. ALPSP warns against the risks posed by the improper handling of data, emphasizing the potential harm to individuals, the development of AI technology, and the integrity of published content.

Furthermore, ALPSP acknowledges the complexity of generative AI development, recognizing that each stage of the AI model’s lifecycle involves distinct data processing activities. They advocate for explicit articulation of purposes for data reuse and stress the importance of transparency requirements to ensure compliance with data protection and copyright laws.

ALPSP urges AI developers to prioritize transparency and adherence to regulatory guidelines, emphasizing the need for meaningful explanations of data usage to all relevant parties. They underscore the importance of individuals and publishers retaining control over their personal data and intellectual property throughout the AI development process.

The response also addresses concerns regarding the potential misuse of personal data and calls for retroactive measures to ensure compliance with data protection principles. ALPSP emphasizes the necessity of strong enforcement of existing regulations and clear articulation of their application to generative AI development.

In conclusion, ALPSP reaffirms its commitment to supporting innovation in AI while advocating for fairness, transparency, and compliance with regulatory frameworks. They express willingness to collaborate with the ICO further and underscore the importance of upholding the principles of accuracy, reliability, and trustworthiness in information dissemination.

ALPSP's response serves as a comprehensive reflection of the challenges and considerations surrounding the intersection of generative AI, data protection, and intellectual property rights, advocating for a balanced and responsible approach to AI regulation.